|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dom Arkaral
The Gold Angels
Sixth Empire
650
   |
Posted - 2016.11.11 12:35:18 -
[1] - Quote
1-What is considered as CONCORD delaying?
2-What types of it are classified as exploits (if any)?
I'd love to get a clear answer on the subject from CCP since I heard a rumor players we warned/banned because of that.
Thanks
P.s. this is more of an academic inquiry than anything else, I'm genuinely curious.
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Nitshe's favorite
Gł+Bane of Holeysaltmountain
01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116
|
Dom Arkaral
The Gold Angels
Sixth Empire
650
|
Posted - 2016.11.11 12:58:40 -
[2] - Quote
Savoycabbage wrote:https://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/eve-online-news/exploit-notification-delaying-concord-response That kinda covers the exploit side of it I think. As far as I'm aware (having never actually suicide ganked anyone), drawing Concord to another location prior to a gank is not an exploit and is considered to be a valid tactic. edit. google is your friend 
I read that when it came out, but the only thing I'm aware that gankers do is "pulling" concord on a station after they gank (by undocking in rookie ships)
That has always been legal unless there was a ninja change somewhere
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Nitshe's favorite
Gł+Bane of Holeysaltmountain
01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116
|
Dom Arkaral
The Gold Angels
Sixth Empire
650
|
Posted - 2016.11.11 13:32:35 -
[3] - Quote
Doddy wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote:Savoycabbage wrote:https://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/eve-online-news/exploit-notification-delaying-concord-response That kinda covers the exploit side of it I think. As far as I'm aware (having never actually suicide ganked anyone), drawing Concord to another location prior to a gank is not an exploit and is considered to be a valid tactic. edit. google is your friend I read that when it came out, but the only thing I'm aware that gankers do is "pulling" concord on a station after they gank (by undocking in rookie ships) That has always been legal unless there was a ninja change somewhere Using anything to delay Concord is an exploit. This does not include somebody else pulling concord by committing a crime on the other side of the system, that is legitimate. The exploit is anything you, the individual player, does to delay concord arriving or destroying you using your flag. This includes mass abandoning flagged drones or jettisoning flagged ships etc. So you can't solo a freighter while concord is chewing through a couple of hundred shuttles.
I'm aware (like a gankers) that you can't abandon ships and such before going gcc
That's the article Savoy linked.
But pulling has always been legit unless something was changed and unannounced
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Nitshe's favorite
Gł+Bane of Holeysaltmountain
01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116
|
Dom Arkaral
The Gold Angels
Sixth Empire
650
|
Posted - 2016.11.13 14:41:53 -
[4] - Quote
Morgan Agrivar wrote:Noragen Neirfallas wrote:Morgan Agrivar wrote:In my last gank, I could have probably warped off to the sun and returned before CONCORD showed up to shoot at me. Now can you actually gank someone and warp off before CONCORD lands on grid? And what happens if you do? That I am curious about when I ganked a Venture with a Gank Atron and two-shotted him before he could do anything.  If you manage to successfuly avoid concord CCP give you a nice reward for your troubles  Is it a hug? \o/
You can't escape Concordokken.
Your warp drive is disabled as soon as you go criminal (in highsec), but
You can warp if you're in a pod
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Nitshe's favorite
Gł+Bane of Holeysaltmountain
01010000 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 011011116
|
|
|
| |
|